Q: What has it got in its pocketses?
A: Ten million cough drops, four keys, a university ID card and SHADOW DRAGON OSHI-
But yeah, not playing it yet. It's going to be my reward for not flipping out and killing anyone this week. I just... I just
had to buy it NO THIS IS NOTHING LIKE THE TIME I WENT OUT FOR MILK AND CAME BACK WITH PHANTOM HOURGLASS, THAT HAPPENED IN A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT MONTH
On a different note, I'm having a problem with my original stuff that I've never had before. I've written the rough draft, I've made notes on what needs fixing, and I've cut two chapters wholesale. Now all I have to do is implement my changes and pay reparations to everyone who's seen the original for the rest of our lives. Simple enough, right? But I'm starting to wonder what the point is. No amount of revision is going to fix what's fundamentally borked about it: it's a character-driven story, and the characters, well...
The protagonist starts out a selfish, whiny, immature twit with a persecution complex. Bad things happen to him, some of which he deserves and more of which he doesn't. He gets better, but not a lot, and even when his intentions are good he's too incompetent to pull it off and then too busy wallowing in self-pity to bother
becoming competent. It takes him a stupidly long time to get his act together. Granted, no one in-story likes him too much or takes him too seriously, and the rest of the main cast is way cooler than he is, but this is still his story, told mostly from his perspective. Most of the big moments are his. Now, I love the kid to death (see: my previously-established weird taste in fictitious people), which in a sense makes it a lot worse. He has some scenes that I intended as completely woobie-tacular, but if he hasn't managed to secure some measure of the reader's good will before then, it's game over faster than you can say "Wesley Crusher"
(although tbqh I always had much more animosity toward Riker, personally. DIAF, scuzzbag).
And this is, as I say, a problem I've never had before. I wrote mainly fanfic for a long time. In fanfic, you don't have to say "look, this character is worthy of your sympathy and here's why." The characters are already established, and presumably you've got it labeled so people know what to expect. When I say a fic is Shinon-centric, that pretty much lays it out: "in this story, the PoV character is a complete prick. Well, maybe not a
complete prick, but mostly." So people who aren't interested are warned off. F'rinstance, I wrote Makalov fic last month. For all the hate Makalov gets, all the forces of FFN gave me exactly one comment on how useless/dumb/ugly he is. Could I have pulled that off with an original character? I sort of doubt it; at any rate, more people who aren't amused by that kind of shenanigans would have seen it and hated it and decided never to read anything of mine again.
In writing someone else's characters, you have that character's whole history of dog-petting, -kicking, or -shooting to play off. Whatever aspect or interpretation of a character you emphasize in any particular fic, all the other stuff is still there, and I think I've been taking that for granted in a big way.
I guess what I'm wondering is, to what extent are you (general "you") willing to give a story the benefit of the doubt if you can't stand the main character at all? Does the protag get any more or less latitude for being such? As someone with both an antihero fetish and a tendency to read/watch/play stuff
just for Those Two Guys (or Team Rocket), I... am out of ways to rephrase what is essentially the same question.